Money Monster Metacritic: Exploring the Impact of Reviews on a Blockbuster

Rate this post

Lights, camera, action! Welcome to the thrilling world of “Money Monster,” a captivating movie that had audiences on the edge of their seats. But in this digital age, where opinions are shared instantly, how can we determine the true worth of a film? That’s where Metacritic comes into play. In this article, we delve into the world of “Money Monster” and its Metacritic ratings to understand the impact of reviews on this financial thriller.

“Money Monster,” directed by Jodie Foster, is a gripping tale that intertwines finance and suspense. George Clooney stars as Lee Gates, a charismatic television personality who offers financial advice. When a disgruntled investor (Jack O’Connell) takes the studio hostage during a live broadcast, Gates must use his wit to survive. But how did this film fare among critics and audiences alike? Let’s explore the role of Metacritic, a prominent review aggregator, in evaluating the success of “Money Monster.”

Money Monster: Plot and Reception

In “Money Monster,” the audience is taken on a rollercoaster ride through the financial world. The movie’s plot revolves around Lee Gates, a flamboyant TV host, who is held hostage on live television by a viewer who lost everything following his investment advice. This thrilling storyline, combined with stellar performances, left audiences captivated.

When it comes to critical reception, “Money Monster” received a mixed bag of reviews. While some critics praised the film’s intense atmosphere and strong performances, others felt that it fell short in terms of character development. However, the true gauge of a movie’s success lies in its Metacritic rating.

Read More:   Blake Lively: The Enigmatic Actress and Fashion Icon

Understanding Metacritic Ratings

Metacritic serves as a hub for critical opinions, aggregating reviews from various sources such as professional critics, online publications, and industry experts. It assigns a Metascore to movies based on these reviews, providing a comprehensive evaluation of a film’s quality. This score is crucial in determining the overall reception of a movie.

The Metascore ranges from 0 to 100, with a higher score indicating favorable reviews. A score above 75 is considered exceptional, while anything below 50 suggests a less favorable response. Metacritic’s methodology ensures that both professional and user reviews are taken into account, allowing audiences to gauge the movie’s worth from multiple perspectives.

Money Monster’s Metacritic Score

Now let’s dive into the specifics of “Money Monster’s” Metacritic score. The film received a Metascore of 55, indicating mixed or average reviews. While this may seem mediocre at first glance, it’s important to remember that Metacritic scores are not solely based on the opinions of professional critics. User reviews also play a significant role in shaping a movie’s score.

Upon closer inspection, “Money Monster” received a user score of 6.4, suggesting a more positive response from the general audience. This stark difference between the Metascore and user score showcases the diversity of opinions, with some viewers finding the film more enjoyable than the critics did.

Comparing “Money Monster” to similar movies in its genre, it becomes evident that the Metacritic score is subjective and open to interpretation. For instance, the critically acclaimed “The Big Short” received a Metascore of 81, indicating a more favorable reception. However, “Money Monster” had its own unique appeal, resonating with a different audience.

Read More:   Pierce Brosnan and Salma Hayek: A Dynamic Duo in the Entertainment Industry

Frequently Asked Questions (FAQ) about “Money Monster” and Metacritic

Q: What is the average rating for “Money Monster” on Metacritic?

A: The average rating for “Money Monster” on Metacritic is 55, indicating mixed or average reviews.

Q: How does Metacritic calculate its scores?

A: Metacritic calculates its scores by aggregating reviews from professional critics and users, assigning a weighted average score based on the perceived quality of each review.

Q: Are Metacritic scores reliable indicators of a movie’s quality?

A: While Metacritic scores provide a comprehensive evaluation, it is essential to consider personal preferences and opinions when determining the quality of a movie.

Q: Can a movie with a low Metacritic score still be successful?

A: Absolutely! A low Metacritic score does not guarantee a movie’s failure. Factors such as marketing, star power, and audience reception can influence a film’s success.

Q: How do user reviews on Metacritic differ from critic reviews?

A: User reviews on Metacritic offer a more diverse perspective, reflecting the opinions of everyday moviegoers. Critics, on the other hand, provide a more analytical and professional viewpoint.


In the cutthroat world of finance, “Money Monster” managed to captivate audiences with its thrilling storyline and exceptional performances. While the film garnered mixed reviews from critics, its Metacritic score of 55 indicates a moderate reception. However, it’s important to remember that Metacritic scores are not the sole determining factor of a movie’s success. Personal preferences and individual experiences shape our perception of films.

So next time you’re debating whether to watch a movie, take a peek at its Metacritic score. But remember, the power lies with you. Trust your instincts, explore a diverse range of opinions, and embark on your own cinematic adventure. Lights out!

Back to top button